HOME – CASE STUDIES 4

Global Apparel Portfolio (Fortune 500)

Operational Redesign Across a Global Apparel Portfolio

Cutting campaign production time in half for a Fortune 500 apparel portfolio and scaling the model across four brands.

The Challenge

What started as a tactical engagement with a single flagship brand had a deceptively simple problem: campaign production was eating an unsustainable number of hours per send, and the team couldn’t increase send volume without breaking. The strategic question wasn’t “how do we send better campaigns?” — it was “how do we restructure the operational model so the team can scale send volume without scaling headcount?”

The Approach's

Cut hours-per-campaign in half on the flagship brand

By redesigning the technical-to-creative handoff, modularizing creative assets, and re-architecting the campaign build process, we cut production time per send by 50% — freeing capacity for the team to ship more campaigns from the same headcount.

Rolled the operational model out across three additional brands in the portfolio

Once the production model worked on the flagship, we replicated it across three sister brands in the portfolio, capturing similar efficiency gains while accounting for each brand’s distinct voice and audience.

Unified segmentation strategy across the portfolio

The four brands shared customer overlap but had been operating their segmentation in silos. We built a portfolio-level segmentation framework that respected brand individuality while enabling cross-brand insight and coordinated lifecycle strategy.

The Outcome

The headline metric — a 50% reduction in production hours per campaign — understates the engagement’s value. The portfolio gained the operational capacity to ship significantly more campaigns without adding headcount, drove meaningful revenue lift from increased send frequency, and emerged with a unified segmentation strategy that made future cross-brand lifecycle work possible. The three-year engagement length reflects the depth of the operational transformation, not the size of the original problem.

“The biggest lifecycle wins usually live in operations, not in tactics. If a team can’t ship campaigns efficiently, no amount of segmentation strategy will save the program.”

Hours per campaign
0 %
Brands re-platformed
0
Engagement length
+ yr

Case Study 4:
DEG/Dentsu Era — Gap Brands

1. The situation
What began as an engagement with a single brand (Gap) was focused on decreasing their hours-per-email campaign metric (which we cut in half!) to enable them to send more campaigns and operationalize their technical + creative processes
2. The 2-3 most important moves you made
After we decreased their hours per campaign metric, for Gap, we moved on to 3 other brands. Then we improved their segmentation across businesses.
3. Timeline
3+ years
4. What else the client got beyond the headline metric
operational change, team capability, and big revenue lift along with cost savings